Substituting Machines for People
by Stan Dubin
As I type this, I'm on hold with Delta Airlines. When I first
called, I simply wanted to talk to one of their reps and get a couple
of fast questions answered about traveling over Thanksgiving.
You're given the option of speaking to a real person by saying the
word "representative" into the phone, but before you can get to this
person, you have to speak (slowly and clearly) where you're flying
from, where you're flying to, what date of departure and what date of
return. The machine mistakes my departure date for another month and
comes back with they can't book my flight because it's not within the
next 367 days (or some large figure like that). I try and try (by
pushing "0" and saying the word "representative") and finally I'm moved
on to a real person.
But not before waiting another 15-20 minutes.
Delta had the only non-stop flights for this trip I was considering,
so I waited this out. If another airline had a non-stop flight, I
definitely would not have waited it out and Delta would've lost a paid
passenger.
All in all, I understand the big airlines need to cut costs. And of
course having a machine (or a web site) handle their reservations saves
them the expense of paying staff. And if most (or possibly all) of the
airlines are using an automated system to deal with their most valuable
commodity (their customers) then I can see how they would justify using
it throughout. The logic goes from Delta execs: well, we're not really
going to lose customers because of automating our interaction with our
customers because the other airlines are doing it too.
And maybe that logic works for the big airlines and large
corporations. But do you really think so? Who wants to be handled by a
robot that sometimes hears what you say but often does not correctly
hear you.
The moral of this story is simple. The less you interact directly
with your customers and the more you put answering machines, automated
tellers, automated phone systems in place to deal with your public, the
more likely you'll see a percentage of your customer base erode away.
You may think you can handle a much larger number of people with the
automated approach and you may be right. But you may also be losing
some quality customers who will not be eager to speak highly of your
company and possibly just the opposite.
I do realize we're moving ever closer to machines doing more and
more of our work. But when you put them between your company and your
customers, especially new customers, I think the downside is greater
than most people can immediately observe.
If someone wants to speak to a real person at your company, I
recommend highly you make it VERY EASY for them to do so.
This article was written by Stan Dubin, Executive Director of The Employee Testing Center.
The Employee Testing Center helps business owners hire honest, trustworthy and dependable staff. Take the free business owner test so you can see for yourself 1) how accurate it is and 2) how it can help you hire better staff.
You may republish this article in your newsletter or at your web site or blog providing the entire article is kept intact, including the contact links. |